hatecomputers.club/templates/about.html

20 lines
2.1 KiB
HTML

{{ define "content" }}
<p>hatecomputers.club is a club for those that, well, <i>hate computers!</i></p>
<br>
<p>we maintain a little homelab mesh for our own little computing community! as a member you'll have access to split-zone dns for our intranet as well as ownership to "*.USER.hatecomputers.club." for which you can do almost anything. we host, and plan to host, all kinds of stuff for each other :).</p>
<br>
<p>you may align with us if you believe any (or all) of the following:</p>
<br>
<ul>
<li>computers, software, and technological advancements need to serve public interests first and foremost, and not private capital.</li>
<li>computers and the internet in the hands of capitalism have caused potentially irreversible effects on our society and the wellbeing of humans.</li>
<li>computers and the integration of automation in most human jobs should be implemented with heavy distrust of the systems developed and account for the well-being of any affected persons. especially when pertaining to "generative technologies".</li>
<li>computers and the data associated to, or describing of, a human or their activities should be protected with utmost security.</li>
<li>the security and maintenance responsiblities of computers and operation thereof, when having direct implications on an individual's livelihood, or the public good, (banking, work, payments, etc.), should fall on the groups building such systems and not on the individual users of such systems. i.e. a person must be sufficiently repaid in full should ownership of digital goods be stolen.</li>
<li>in addition, the acts of tampering, modification, and "hacking" a computer, as long as said actions are served in good intentions and the benefit of the public's best interests and not private capital, should not be punishable and instead praised or rewarded in relation to the scope of the information, methodology, impact, and results obtained.</li>
<li>computers and systems should not have been corporatized and should have been, and continue to be, completely open to the user and researchers to develop upon.</li>
</ul>
{{ end }}