From bbdf98d88ac8a19e6edb5f85ef1d1ebf94f02d23 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Elizabeth Hunt <elizabeth@simponic.xyz>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 12:31:15 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] remove duplicate tenet

---
 templates/about.html | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/templates/about.html b/templates/about.html
index d1a8c7e..3c4c265 100644
--- a/templates/about.html
+++ b/templates/about.html
@@ -7,15 +7,13 @@
 <p>you may align with us if you believe any (or all) of the following:</p>
 <br>
 <ul>
+  <li>computers, software, and technological advancements need to serve public interests first and foremost, and not private capital.</li>
   <li>computers and the internet in the hands of capitalism have caused potentially irreversible effects on our society and the wellbeing of humans.</li>
-  <li>computers and the data associated to, or describing of, a human or their activities should be protected with utmost security.</li>
   <li>computers and the integration of automation in most human jobs should be implemented with heavy distrust of the systems developed and account for the well-being of any affected persons. especially when pertaining to "generative technologies".</li>
-  <li>the security and maintenance responsiblities of computers and operation thereof, when having direct implications on an individual's livelihood, or the public good, (banking, work, payments, etc.), should fall on the groups building such systems and not on the individual users of such systems.</li>
+  <li>computers and the data associated to, or describing of, a human or their activities should be protected with utmost security.</li>
+  <li>the security and maintenance responsiblities of computers and operation thereof, when having direct implications on an individual's livelihood, or the public good, (banking, work, payments, etc.), should fall on the groups building such systems and not on the individual users of such systems. i.e. a person must be sufficiently repaid in full should ownership of digital goods be stolen.</li>
   <li>in addition, the acts of tampering, modification, and "hacking" a computer, as long as said actions are served in good intentions and the benefit of the public's best interests and not private capital, should not be punishable and instead praised or rewarded in relation to the scope of the information, methodology, impact, and results obtained.</li>
   <li>computers and systems should not have been corporatized and should have been, and continue to be, completely open to the user and researchers to develop upon.</li>
-  <li>the acts of tampering, modification, and "hacking" a computer, as long as said actions are served in the public's best interests and not private capital, should not be punishable and instead praised or rewarded.</li>
-  <li>computers, software, and technological advancements need to serve public interests first and foremost, and not private capital.</li>
-  <li>among others...</li>
 </ul>
 
 {{ end }}